Judge Munamato Mutevedzi Profile| High Court Justice, Chief Magistrate, Tapiwa Makore Trial, Notable Cases and Rulings
Munamato Mutevedzi is a Zimbabwean lawyer and judge who currently serves on the High Court bench. Before his appointment to the High Court of Zimbabwe, he served as a magistrate and later attained the position of Chief Magistrate.
He was born in Zimbabwe and his date of birth is currently not publicly available. Information regarding his early life, family background, and upbringing is limited. Mutevedzi pursued his education in the field of law, displaying a keen interest in the legal profession from an early age. He attended reputable educational institutions where he obtained the necessary qualifications and skills to excel in his chosen career path. Further details about his educational background, including the names of the institutions he attended and the degrees or certifications he obtained, are not readily accessible.
Legal Career
Appointment as Chief Magistrate
In December 2019, Munamato Mutevedzi assumed the role of acting chief magistrate following the suspension of Mr Mishrod Guvamombe, who was facing charges of criminal abuse of office. During this period, Mutevedzi efficiently managed the responsibilities of the position, ensuring the smooth functioning of the magistrate’s court system in Zimbabwe.
Following a thorough selection process conducted by the Judicial Service Commission (JSC), Mutevedzi was appointed as the substantive chief magistrate on March 27, 2020. His appointment came after the resignation of Mr. Mishrod Guvamombe and subsequent interviews with five qualifying officers for the position. Mutevedzi, who had been serving as the JSC deputy secretary in charge of legal services and acting chief magistrate, was chosen as the most suitable candidate for the role. His extensive knowledge of the legal system and his experience in the judiciary contributed to his selection as the chief magistrate.
Promotion to the High Court Bench
On an important note, Munamato Mutevedzi was promoted to the High Court bench by President Emmerson Mnangagwa. The promotion took place in September 2021 after public interviews held by the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) in the previous month.
Mutevedzi’s promotion was part of a larger set of appointments to the High Court, with eight other judges joining him in taking up their new positions. The newly appointed judges, namely Rogers Manyangadze Foroma, Chipo Annie-Lucy Mungwari, Elijah Makomo, Never Katiyo, Joseph Chilimbe, Bongani Ndlovu, Samuel Deme, and Catherine Kate Bachi-Muzawazi, were sworn in alongside Mutevedzi.
These appointments came after the JSC conducted interviews and made recommendations to President Mnangagwa, who then acted upon the recommendations by appointing the recommended candidates to the High Court bench. The vacancies that led to these appointments arose from various circumstances, such as judges being fired, retiring, or receiving promotions to the apex court.
[Image Credit: Youtube/ZTN Prime]
Notable Cases and Rulings
Controversial Ruling on Corporal Punishment
In a highly controversial case that sparked national debate, High Court Judge Munamato Mutevedzi delivered a ruling that had significant implications for the classification of beating children under Zimbabwean law. The case involved Yeukai Graham Mutero, a woman who was charged with murder after beating her 12-year-old son, Desmond Kuzivakwashe Matsatsi, to death in January 2022.
Justice Mutevedzi ruled that beating children is permissible under Zimbabwean law and cannot be classified as assault or a criminal offence. He argued that corporal punishment administered by a reasonable parent for disciplinary purposes should not be considered criminal, emphasizing that Mutero’s actions fell within the bounds of permissible assault. The judge further stated that any “reasonable parent” who believes in corporal punishment would have done the same thing.
This ruling drew significant criticism and raised concerns about the protection of children’s rights in Zimbabwe. Many individuals and organizations questioned the judgment, arguing that it undermined efforts to safeguard children from abuse and violence. The ruling’s impact on child protection laws and the overall welfare of children in Zimbabwe remains a topic of ongoing discussion and debate.
Sentencing in Gruesome Murder Cases
Justice Munamato Mutevedzi presided over several high-profile murder cases that shocked the nation due to their brutality and shocking nature. In these cases, he delivered judgments that reflected the gravity of the crimes committed and aimed to provide justice for the victims and their families.
Emelda Marizani Murder Trial
One such case involved Emelda Marizani, a Chivhu mother who gruesomely killed her four minor children in 2020. Marizani claimed she committed the act out of love, believing she was protecting them from potential abuse and suffering by a stepmother. Justice Mutevedzi dismissed her claims of mental disorder and diminished responsibility and found her guilty of four counts of murder. He subsequently sentenced her to four terms of life imprisonment, emphasizing the aggravated circumstances surrounding the murders and the immense pain caused to the children and the community.
Tapiwa Makore Murder Trial
In another landmark case, Justice Mutevedzi delivered a long-awaited judgment in the brutal murder of seven-year-old Tapiwa Makore. The accused killers, Tafadzwa Shamba and Tapiwa Makore Snr, were found guilty of drugging, killing, and mutilating the young boy for ritual purposes. The judge highlighted the premeditated and meticulously planned nature of the crime, as well as the use of illicit brew as a form of torture. Considering the gravity of the offence, Justice Mutevedzi sentenced both perpetrators to death, emphasizing that no amount of jail term would suffice.
These rulings showcased Justice Mutevedzi’s commitment to upholding the law, ensuring justice for victims, and maintaining public confidence in the judiciary.
Personal Life and Legacy
Details regarding Munamato Mutevedzi’s personal life, including his family, hobbies, and other personal interests, are not publicly available. As a judge, his legacy will be shaped by his contributions to the Zimbabwean legal system and his judgments in significant cases.
